Obama Is On The 2nd Amendment Warpath Again

Print page

Obama Second Amendment WarpathEveryone knows that President Obama is strongly against our rights to own firearms. He’s never made that a secret and has worked hard to do everything in his power to take our guns away from us.

Unfortunately for him and fortunately for us, all his actions have succeeded in doing, to date, is to increase the number of privately owned firearms in the country. But this time, damage has already been done, and it’s not over yet.

It seemed like Obama’s plans to take away our 2nd Amendment rights were finally put to an end with the 2014 midterm elections. With both houses of Congress firmly in the hands of the Republicans, almost all of whom supported our rights to bear arms, Obama was going to have a hard time going forward with any sort of plans to take away our rights.

But, as he’s said himself, Obama has a pen and a phone and he is not afraid to use either one of them.

{adinserter aliveafteramerika}We all know that Obama has little regard for the law and less for the Constitution.

It seems that the only laws he holds in high regard are the ones that he pushed through the Democrat controlled Congress, back when he first started out.

Other than that, he’s been ignoring whatever laws he chooses and illegally creating new laws by executive fiat.

The other way that Obama is creating laws that he wants is through regulations. The various departments of the government create regulations to define how different laws which are passed by Congress will be enforced. Many times these regulations deal with such mundane issues as what government red tape one has to fight their way through; but sometimes, the regulations change the meaning of the law, making things tougher than intended. Obama’s administration has used this loophole to great effect.

Theoretically, Congress has a right to deny those regulations, but that rarely happens. So, what some nameless bureaucrat writes in some hidden office, ends up having as much power as a law passed by Congress.

Up until now, the Republicans have had little success in putting a stop to Obama’s illegal actions. There is still hope that they will be able to, but that will require the Republicans taking some bold action and standing their ground, forcing Obama to capitulate for a change. I’m not sure that we’ll see that happen.

Surprisingly enough, Obama’s latest attack against firearm ownership is perfectly legal. All he’s doing is redefining something under an existing law.

In other words, he’s given orders to a department of the government to modify a regulation, making something that was previously legal, illegal.

To my mind, this is changing the law, something that only Congress is supposed to be able to do. But I assure you, this time Obama is within the limits of what the law allows him to do.

However, we should still be concerned, because it is a direct attack against our 2nd Amendment rights, one that uses an unconstitutional law as its basis, but that law has been on the books since 1968.

Video first seen on Metal Head Patriot.

Since Obama hasn’t been able to keep “military style firearms” (the AR-15) out of the hands of civilians, he’s going to limit the availability of ammunition. Under the provisions of the sporting purposes clause of the Gun Control Act of 1968, he is stating that the green tipped ammunition for the AR-15, isn’t for sporting purposes. This ammunition is being called “armor piercing” but in actuality it is “armor penetrating.”

The difference between those two terms may seem insignificant, but they are distinctly different. Armor piercing rounds are steel core with a copper jacket. They are designed for piercing lightly armored vehicles. Armor penetrating rounds are lead core, with a copper jacket. However, unlike normal “jacketed ball” ammunition, there is a small steel tip on the front end of the lead core. This helps the round penetrate ballistic armor, although it won’t penetrate lightly armored vehicles.

Green tipped ammo has historically been some of the least expensive ammunition available for the AR-15. Much of it is imported, competing with domestically made jacketed ball. However, with this new definition of this ammunition no longer being considered “sporting ammunition,” it will no longer be available. People can keep the ammo they own, but they won’t be able to buy more.

By the way, this Sporting Purposes Clause of the Gun Control Act of 1968 is what I said earlier about an unconstitutional law. According to this clause, the reason that the 2nd Amendment exists is so that we, the citizens of the United States, can keep firearms for sporting purposes.

There’s just one problem with that, I seriously doubt that any of the Founding Fathers even thought about sporting uses of firearms, let alone created this amendment to protect it. Back then, firearms were necessary for protection and hunting was done for food, not for trophies to hang on the wall.

The Second Amendment clearly exists for the purpose of defending the country. That’s what it says. It doesn’t require any interpretation or spin, it just requires reading. Defense from what? Since they had just fought a war against tyranny, I’d say that some new tyranny raising up was their biggest concern. They were probably also concerned with personal and home defense, as those were dangerous times to live in. Not having a gun could be an invitation to criminals.

BPH4.1

Obama’s actions have already caused the price of 5.56mm and .223 ammunition to rise. From Monday to Wednesday of last week, the wholesale cost of this ammunition rose by 60 percent. This is clearly a way of keeping not only the green tipped ammo out of the hands of law-abiding citizens, but also all 5.56 ammunition out of their hands.

If Obama is successful with this move, you can be sure that he will have his team of lawyers looking for loopholes to declare that other types of ammunition aren’t for sporting use as well.

We could very easily see the usefulness of our guns wither away, right along with the availability of ammunition. What would happen next?

This article has been written by Bill White for Survivopedia.

References:

http://www.idahostatejournal.com/members/atf-wants-to-ban-popular-ar–ammo/article_e7679442-b994-11e4-b9eb-5b8b7eefded3.html

http://www.news-leader.com/story/news/local/ozarks/2015/02/21/ban-armor-piercing-bullets/23816437/

Rate this article!
[Total: 19    Average: 3.9/5]
 

31,848 total views, 4 views today

Bill White

About Bill White

Bill White is the author of Conquering the Coming Collapse, and a former Army officer, manufacturing engineer and business manager. More recently, he left the business world to work as a cross-cultural missionary on the Mexico border. Bill has been a survivalist since the 1970s, when the nation was in the latter days of the Cold War. He had determined to head into the Colorado Rockies, should Washington ever decide to push the button. While those days have passed, the knowledge Bill gained during that time hasn’t. He now works to educate others on the risks that exist in our society and how to prepare to meet them. You can send Bill a message at editor [at] survivopedia.com.
Rate this article!
[Total: 19    Average: 3.9/5]

Comments

  1. mahatma Muhjesbude says:

    Bill, this regime has been aggressively attempting to marginalize the 2nd/A by de facto 'administrative mandates' since the current POTUS took his first oath to protect and preserve the Constitution. As for the ammo-- which technically is not mentioned in the 2nd/A-- they try to get away with a lot of restrictive 'control' measures based on this 'omission' and the specious logic that since ammo is then NOT Constitutionally protected, we can strictly prohibit it by administrative 'policy'.

    They've already a couple combined strategies to do this. The first was to restrict import of relatively cheap surplus munitions and parts at the port of entry. This is really what that United Nations rule that Hillary supported was about. The next one was to use the already in place EPA laws on Lead use restriction for ammo. Since virtually all bullets are made out of lead, that would put a severe paucity on ammo acquisition. There are companies like Hornady which makes some all copper bullets but the daunting overwhelming task of manufacturers changing all ammo to copper/brass after an all out ban on use of lead would severely stop the universal flow of ammo. The combination of all of these tactics And now this latest restriction of so-called armor piercing ammo in the form of basically standard FMJ/ball ammo, which constitutes the largest part of bullet styles, would all together literally shut down availability after the greedy scalpers cleaned off the current stock from the shelves.

    I guess they won?

    You know it amazes me how many long hours through so many days and nights they stayed up thinking about a move like this? These leftist fanatics must give a special cash prize to anyone who comes up with the best ideas to help disarm the populate. This was kind 'counter-loophole' based on the fact of their unanticipated 'backfire' against 'assault style military firearms' causing this country to now have the largest most well armed standing army in the world in the form of its Constitutionally protected civilian militia potential.

    And when AR-15 pistols started gaining so much popularity, they quickly picked up on the fact that the treasonous '68 GCA says pistol caliber ammo is not allowed to fire armor piercing ammo (ostensibly to protect police wearing vests). So now that 'standard' 5.56x49 ammo is used in the AR-15 'Pistol', this ammo, too, must be banned! Which means the rifle/carbine version of the AR-15, which also fires the same ammo, cannot use it either!
    Imagine spending all that time paid for by our tax dollars just to violate our Constitutional right to bear arms without infringement?!

    Well, in light of all that there's only one thing we can do while we still can? We must seriously 'urge' our newly hired legislative 'employees' to start 'gunning' up with some serious Pro-Constitutional 2nd Amendment guaranteeing counter attack laws. Including the unqualified REPEAL of All current anti-2nd/A 'laws'.

    I mean, it almost makes all true American Patriots look like the dumbest sheeple on the planet if we continue to let an out of control government use OUR tax dollars to erode OUR constitutional right to bear arms?

    (40)
    (0)
  2. Rogan Muldoon says:

    While I agree in every respect with what MAHATMA MUHJESBUDE says, the one thing that the anti 2nd Amendment crew have in their favor is that those who SUPPORT the amendment are essentially law abiding people. Obama et al use this against us.

    (12)
    (0)
  3. Robert Ross says:

    Well, Well, Well. We all know that has his handy phone and pen. Me and I don't know how many Patriots have our guns and Ammo. Locked & loaded, MOLON LABE !!!! I am a VIET NAM vet. Obummer fears the armed citizen and combat vets. And I hope our PATRIOTIC military. With all his blunders this is another one. And if we should lose, which I don't think GOD would allow. I would rather die than be in a FEMA camp or be a slave to a bunch of ragheads. I will not live on my knees. In the BIBLE GOD says that if you turn back to me , I will heal your land. Our gov.'t has turned their backs on our God and our country !!!!!!!!

    (36)
    (0)
    • ulysses hickman says:

      It's amazing to me how some people can cry about their rights while denying, if possible, the rights of others. My point being, the right of people to vote without unfair difficulty. You talk about obeying the Constitution. Bush and Chaney got us in a war that was not sanctioned. Now look where we are. But, all that is Obama's fault to. You got a foreigner like Ted Cruse coming in and causing all this angst. And he is a foreigner. He was born in Canada. I can't understand how he could even run for the Presidential spot.

      (0)
      (3)
      • it is not a matter my friend of making it harder to vote, that voter id is all about, it is a matter of keeping people from voting more then once, and keeping non US citizens from voting.

        (3)
        (0)
      • Ted Cruz was born in Canada. No dispute about that. However, his parents were US diplomats stationed in Canada at the time. If you bother to read what constitutes a US citizen, you will find that children born under these circumstances are US citizens, just as if they were born on US soil. I won't go into the details surrounding that provision. You should be capable of doing the research yourself and possibly learning a little something on the side.

        (2)
        (0)
  4. DICTATORS MUST HAVE YOUR GUNS FIRST.

    (15)
    (0)
    • Dictators and illegal presidents that want the immigration act to pass so he can have instant democratic voters. Either push for martial law or pass a law to stop limits on presidential terms. This regime since the beginning has been hell bent on destroying this country and giving it to the UN and the muslims!

      (4)
      (0)
      • ulysses hickman says:

        You talk like a brainwashed person. Illegal president. He was voted in by the people. TWICE. Your way of thinking is a cancer that has been in this country since the 1400. God does not like ugly. He has everything under control. What is ,,is and what is to be,,will be.

        (0)
        (5)
  5. The 2nd amendment is not only for defending our nation from foreign invaders, but to protect the people from the government gaining absolute authority. The document below is one I found when doing a report on the 2nd amendment. I do not remember who wrote it, but it was not me and I am not attempting to get credit for it. Please Read:

    What is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment? Is it, as the left claims, to ensure that the States have the ability to arm their National Guard troops? Is it, as some claim, put into the Constitution to ensure that people would be able to hunt? Or is it something else?
    The simple fact is that if a person simply reads the black and white text of the Constitution without any preconceived prejudice it should be quite clear what this Amendment does, but not why. “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Simply put there is no Constitutional method of limiting the ability of the people to bear arms, other than another Constitutional Amendment, ratified treaty or a complete scrapping of the existing Constitution. This means that by the text of the Constitution you or I are allowed to own a Howitzer if we so choose because there is nothing within that document which limits the right to bear arms in any way shape or form.
    Some of the confusion over the actual purpose of this Amendment is based on its preamble which states “a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state”. This is where the National Guard interpretation comes into play. Those who read that as a qualifier believe that the 2nd Amendment only applies to the state militia, which we now call the National Guard. The only problem with that theory is that if you ask the man who wrote it, you will find it was not his intent at all. In fact James Madison stated quite clearly that the militia is the body of the people, in other words, it is the citizens of this Republic. So based on Mr. Madison’s statement about the amendment he wrote we can rule out the militia as the National Guard argument.
    So is it about hunting? We can refer to the writings of any number of founding fathers to answer this question, but none are as appropriate as the ones from the mouth of the man who crafted this protection. Again we turn to James Madison, “The right of the people to keep and bear…arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country…” If you take this statement literally it is not about hunting, but instead is about Liberty. More importantly the defense of liberty. This is a theme echoed among our founding fathers, editors, and other figures throughout the time of the drafting of the 2nd Amendment. No statement could be more clear than that of Thomas Jefferson who said to James Madison in a letter “What country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”
    The second Amendment is about keeping the government fearful of the people and therefore subservient to us. Take away our weapons and we have no way to defend ourselves from a potentially despotic regime which manages to get elected, perform a coupe or some other method of eliminating our Representative Republic and replacing it with something else against the will of the people. Remember that without the Right to Bear Arms none of the other rights mean a thing because there is nothing that can prevent them from being taken away. It is the right, which secures all of the other rights.

    (25)
    (0)
    • Mahatma, great comment.
      The problem is all members of Congress to an extent, are in bed together. They fill their pockets with millions of dollars using milker Bills to extort money from the corporations and wealthy individuals in America. Believe me, they are not to be trusted. I tried to get people together on the web to begin a writing, e-mailing, faxing and calling campaign to impeach Obama. Most of he people that contacted me call me names and supported Obama.

      Fact is, the American people don't realize what is really going on with Obama. I will tell you this, Obama is a muslim and he is OUR enemy.

      (7)
      (0)
      • mahatma Muhjesbude says:

        Calvin, You're a good patriot but don't waste your valuable time trying to impeach him. If Benghazi, the IRS, Fast and Furious, the killing of our poor disabled combat Vets, and certified violations of our Constitutional privacy along with everything else didn't get Congress to unanimously start proceedings by now, even if they did it tomorrow, the current office of POTUS would be vacated before it would get very far.
        But we CAN change the laws if these new 'employees' of ours start keeping their promises like they are supposed to do as part of the reason we fired the others and hired them?!
        I've been pushing this for over a year now and it's starting to gain momentum. all we have to do to at least STOP the rapid slide down the slippery slope of absolute totalitarianism is to REPEAL all current gun control laws ASAP. or at least the big three basically Unconstitutional ones fraudulently enacted over the past three generations with only one purpose in mind, to totally DISARM the populate. And like Russ puts so perspicaciously, for all the evil and wrong reasons. They cleverly cloaked their intention under the completely specious notion of preventative 'crime prevention, and public safety which turns out to be one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated on 'We, the People'.

        Concentrate your efforts on 'motivating' our so-called legislature to begin proceeding in this direction. That's our only chance to save ourselves at the moment.

        (3)
        (0)
        • Remember, John Roberts would preside over impeachment hearings and no matter what the Senate says, he'd just say Obama is a "tax" and gets to stay....

          I do have questions about the ammo ban and need to filter out the noise. When does the ban officially start? Is there an equivalent ammo in .223 that isn't affected? Is there an equivalent 5.56X45 round? It sounds like the "green tip" ammo isn't "all that" from what I have read about it...that there are much better-performing rounds. It sounds to me like the prez is trying to get rid of any bullet that might be able to penetrate a vest, and these days, not JUST cops and the gov't alphabet soup wears it - criminals do too in some cases.

          All this talk about the gov't coming to "get us" is interesting, but in the short-term I'm concerned with defending my home because I already have one bullet in my back from when a gang got ahold of me in an initiation and since criminal cases are public record, they know my name and where I live and others in their gang could come after me - all it would take is some "new leader" trying to make a name for himself and I'll be in a world of trouble. I can't afford to move out of state, so I'm kinda stuck here. Not looking to fight but if people bust down my door into my house wearing vests and carrying guns, I guess it doesn't much matter who is behind it.

          If someone could reply with basic answers and/or links about the differences, I'd appreciate it....I do know enough about rifles to know you can use .223 in a 5.56 but not the other way around due to chamber pressures, and I don't have a 5.56.....thanks in advance!

          (1)
          (0)
        • whip holt says:

          Mahatma, you are wrong. The first act of business for the congress should have been to impeach Obama, not for any specific acts perpetrated after he was sworn into office, but for being an illegitimate president. The only birth certificates he produced were fake; all three of them were Photo shopped and/or had glaring errors which proved they were false. Then if he were found guilty of not being qualified for that position, EVERYTHING accomplished during his office tenure would be NULL AND VOID! He is an imposter, and a walking false flag. At least that would set our country back on a proper path.

          The second order of business then should have been dismantling all these federal agencies which are patently unconstitutional, such as BLM, NSA, Homeland Security, FBI, ad nauseum. Allow all of those bureaucrats who are tearing this country apart get real jobs.

          Then the third thing to be accomplished is to give full control back to the states of all the land the feds have stolen. The Constitution clearly specifies the only lands in a state which may be controlled by the federal government are 10 miles square for the seat of government, and storage facilities (powder houses) for arms and munitions. If the feds want an air base or a training ground for the military, they can rent the land from the states.

          The last item of business for congress is to remove all taxing of the general public as the IRS is illegal because the 16th Amendment was never ratified by the states.

          Our beloved country is 95% of the way to a dictatorship. It’s the old story about the frog in the pan of water… we have had incremental travel toward tyranny for 100 years, and if an unconstitutional martial law is accomplished, we will have a 2nd Civil War that will make the 1861-1865 conflict look like a Sunday School picnic!

          (0)
          (0)
      • ulysses hickman says:

        I can definitely tell you this. You're an atheist

        (0)
        (0)
  6. still enjoy all your posts!

    (2)
    (0)
  7. Do politicians want to limit our self-defense options to make us safer or to make us easier to control? Think it all the way through, if you have that ability.

    (7)
    (0)
  8. Will the police and the military continue to have access to this ammunition? From what I've read here, it doesn't say that manufacture of this ammunition or its importation will be curtailed. It just says that this type of ammunition, as a finished unit, will no longer be available for purchase by the public. That means that the components will still be manufactured and obviously available. Therefore can we explore possibility of getting around the ban by purchasing each individual component i.e. the brass, powder, primer and bullet and make our own. You never know. They can't close all loopholes. You may be surprised to find out that the law covers only the ammunition as a finished unit and not its components. I wish that we all follow up on this. A wise man once said,"In the midst of adversity there is always opportunity.

    (6)
    (0)
  9. special forces says:

    when I brought this up over a week ago , nobody looked at it . its not just about ar-15 ammunition , obummer wants us citizens to have no ammo for any rifle , so the only ones that have weapons with ammo , are his radical islamists people , like jim jones said drink this tonic and you go to heaven , if you didn't drink his potion you got shot by jim jones armed guards . so like mayor guilani says , obummer doesn't like America ,or its people , obummers god and beliefs are not like our Christian brothers and sisters , with out ammunition we are subject to loosing our 2nd amendment rights , obummer has to go , guliani is 100percent rite , thank god some one has started calling out obummer for what he is , maybe some of the people who got voted in will start to show how big there balls are , they will have to take my guns and ammo from my dead body , im not a religious man I just believe in god , and my god says -- do unto others as they do unto you , so bring it on Islamic extremist , or any other obummer followers . obummer you made change , and started a war , I will try and defend America , and its people .

    (17)
    (0)
    • Calvin Howell Heinen says:

      I am with you and so are millions of Christians, atheist and agnostics. I truly believe the military will be on our side. Obama doesn't understand honor.
      Everything is politically correct on paper or its not.

      (3)
      (0)
    • TPSnodgrass says:

      Of course, the Obamafuerher and his pals need to disarm the American populace. How else can he fundamentally transform the USA into an Islaamic State? Al-Shabab and ISIS can't succeed in their forced conversions unless we are all disarmed. To quote Winston Churchill, "..never give in, never surrender, never, never." I'm not a good little Marxist-Proglodyte-Sheep.

      (6)
      (0)
  10. Well well well if the republicans would get to work and stop all of this c*** and do their job and stop all this c*** it would not be happening !! If they would all stick together and get the help from the people and all inundate the white house with their letters ect: and with ALL of the republicans to lead the way with what ever it takes to do the job. We won't have to worry about it. Is there not enough of them that know how to get it done

    (1)
    (0)
  11. Derek Rebel says:

    When they start making people take down their flag's (which they are) taking away parent right's,( doing this too!) they want to regulate the internet and keep certain news from us. (in the work's & already happening )
    they want to take the gun's from law abiding citizen's and keep em in the hand's of the bad guy's. we have seen how our GOV. releases the worst of the worst terrorist, and then the terrorist parade our people before the camera's before the murder them. think about this EMINENT DOMAIN/PATRIOT ACT/ OBAMA -CARE.. just the freedom's we have lost over these thing's & more, and there are more in the work's.. we see clearly now, they are turning us into a socialist society.

    (3)
    (0)
  12. special forces says:

    I TOLD YOU ALL HE JUST WANTS ISIS TO HAVE AMMO AND GUNS , WE BETTER GET BACK ON THE HIGH HORSE LIKE HE SAID , IF YOU THINK HE DORSNT WANT THIS TO BE A NATION OF JUST MUSLUMS , YOU BETTER OPEN YOUR EYES , THE YOUNGER GENERATION DOESNT REALIZE THE PARTY IS OVER , MY VEITNAM BUDDYS WILL BE VISITING THE WALL SOON IN FLORIDA , I HOPE I HEAR MORE FROM THEM ON HOW OBUMMER WANTS TO KILL US , I KNOW VETS THAT SAID THEY LIKED OBUMMER MORE THAN ROMNEY , I CANT WAIT TO HEAR HOW THEY FEEL NOW , I WISH SOME BODY FROM THE MEDIA WOULD SHOW UP AND DO SOME INTERVIEUS , ILL LET OBUMMER KNOW WHAT I THINK , I WONT SALUTE A PIECE OF **** . HE WAS NEVER MY COMANDER AND CHIEF .

    (5)
    (0)
  13. Russ Dees says:

    Secure Arkansas posted a new article on the 2nd Amendment everyone may want to take a look at...

    http://securetherepublic.com/arkansas/2015/03/01/con-con-2nd-amendment-rights/

    (1)
    (0)
    • Russ Dees says:

      By the way the House Joint Resolution 1003 is attempting to use Article 5 of the constitution to create a new constitution.

      Article 5 - Amendment:
      The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

      (1)
      (0)
  14. SPECIAL FORCES says:

    YOU MIGHT THINK THIS IS CRAZY BUT ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS PUT 2 PLUS 2 AND IF YOU HAVE ANY BRAINS YOU WILL COME UP WITH THE ANSWER , THE ANSWER IS 4 . ERIK HOLDER GAVE WEAPONS TO THE CARTELL , WHICH WAS RUN BY ESCARBAR . OBUMMER WANTS YOU , NOT TO HAVE ANY WEAPONS , ESCARBAR KILLED SO MANY OF HIS OWN PEOPLE BEFORE HIS DEATH , IF YOU THINK ERIK HOLSTER AND OBUMMER DONT HAVE THE SAME THING IN MINE , YOU BETTER WAKE UP . OBUMMER AND HOLSTER HAVE ALL READY STARTED A WAR . THE WAR IS RACISIM , AND THE DEATH OF WHITE AMERICA , THE BLACK AND WHITE CITUATION WAS BETTER 8 YEARS AGO THAN IT IS TODAY , OBUMMER HAS NEVER SAID A GOOD WORD ABOUT AMERICA OR ITS PEOPLE , OBUMMER IS BRINGING MORE THAN 75,000 OF HIS ISLAMIC BUDDYS OVER HERE FROM SYERIA TO HELP HIS BATTLE AGAINST AMERICA , THERE ARE SO MANY THINGS TO SAY HOW BAD THIS ADMINISTRATION IS , IM HAVEING A HARD TIME KEEPING UP WITH IT , THE ENEMY OF YOUR ENEMY - IS YOUR ENEMY , LIKE NETANYAHU IS SAYING RIGHT NOW , THEY DONT WANT TO WIN THE BATTLE THEY WANT TO WIN THE WAR , ISRAEL OUR BEST ALLIE IS BEING DISCRASED BY THIS REGIME IF YOU CANT SEE IT , YOUR BLIND . AND JOHN KERRY IS SAYING WE ARE ALL SAFER TODAY THAN WE EVER WERE , HE WAS A GOFER IN VIETNAM AND HES STILL A GOFER TODAY . REMEMBER ESCARBAR WANTED TO RULE HIS COUTRY , AND THATS WHAT OBUMMER WANTS , OBUMMER HAS TO STOP TERROISM AROUND THE WORLD , BUT HE IS ONLY HELPING IT , OBUMMER HAS PUT NO PREASURE ON ANY TERRORIST SINCE HE GOT INTO OFFICE . HE ALL READY HAS 5 MILLION ILLEGALS IN THE U.S.A. THATS HIS ARMY . WE THE PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO DEFEND OUR SELVES , SO DONT LET OBUMMER CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION , KEEP YOUR WEAPONS DONT GIVE THEM AWAY , FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM ,DONT LET THEM PUT YOU IN FEMA CAMPS THATS THE START OF YOUR DEATH , ASK THE JEWS , YOU KNOW OBUMMER DOESNT LIKE THE JEWISH PEOPLE , OR AMERICANS , THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF AMERICANS BEING HELD HOSTAGE IN IRAN , IS OBUMMER DOING ANY THING TO HELP THEM , GET RID OF THIS REGIME , YOU KNOW IF YOU GET KILLED FIGHTING FOR YOUR FREEDOM , THE MEDIA AND THIS REGIME WILL SAY YOUR A TERRORIST . IM WILLING TO FIGHT FOR MY RIGHTS , I PRAY FOR BLACKS AND WHITES TO WAKE UP .

    (3)
    (0)
  15. Why has the U.S. President said it is important for his guards to have loaded weapons, but the U.S. Citizen has no right to protect/defend themselves or their family with a weapon of any sort. He also must think that his life is much more important than any U.S. Citizen! It so interesting how incompetent liberals always talk out of both sides of their mouths and are the only persons in the U.S. who are important to be kept alive!

    (2)
    (0)
  16. Could it be that if the USA is at war, the role of the presidency cannot be changed? I heard that many years ago and that has always stated in my mind. I am 71 BUT I do gave a rather stable mind.

    (0)
    (0)

Trackbacks

  1. […] are excellent equalizers but can run out of bullets and require some knowledge to use. Knives definitely require skill and body strength, along with […]

    (1)
    (0)
  2. […] are excellent equalizers but can run out of bullets and require some knowledge to use. Knives definitely require skill and body strength, along with […]

    (1)
    (0)
  3. […] are excellent equalizers but can run out of bullets and require some knowledge to use. Knives definitely require skill and body strength, along with […]

    (0)
    (0)
  4. […] right that tyrannical governments gleefully strip away is the right to own a firearm for personal […]

    (1)
    (0)
  5. […] though Obama may have failed in his latest quest to gut the Second Amendment, it stands to reason that there will come a time when conventional firearms and ammo will no longer […]

    (0)
    (0)
  6. […] On top of that, the other day following the South Carolina church massacre Obama’s despicable ‘let no good tragedy go to waste’ talking point slider on needing more 2nd Amendment violations–and that’s what these bills should be called, not the leftist euphemism of ‘gun control’– certain legislatures released their poisonous propaganda and followed Hairball Reed’s latest push to fire up the old citizen disarmament bandwagon by pushing for accelerated votes on current 2/A violating gun measures and bills. […]

    (1)
    (0)
  7. […] On top of that, the other day following the South Carolina church massacre Obama’s despicable ‘let no good tragedy go to waste’ talking point slider on needing more 2nd Amendment violations–and that’s what these bills should be called, not the leftist euphemism of ‘gun control’– certain legislatures released their poisonous propaganda and followed Hairball Reed’s latest push to fire up the old citizen disarmament bandwagon by pushing for accelerated votes on current 2/A violating gun measures and bills. […]

    (0)
    (0)
  8. […] citizens being mistreated, imprisoned and even killed by their government, when they allow the government to take away their guns. Probably the most infamous of these examples was the Holocaust, where Hitler and the NAZIs killed […]

    (0)
    (0)
  9. […] citizens being mistreated, imprisoned and even killed by their government, when they allow the government to take away their guns. Probably the most infamous of these examples was the Holocaust, where Hitler and the NAZIs killed […]

    (0)
    (0)
  10. […] Ever since President Obama took office, he’s been seeking every opportunity he could to infringe upon those rights. Gun and ammo sales have gone through the roof, as people have sought to make sure that they bought […]

    (0)
    (0)
  11. […] Ever since President Obama took office, he’s been seeking every opportunity he could to infringe upon those rights. Gun and ammo sales have gone through the roof, as people have sought to make sure that they bought […]

    (0)
    (0)
  12. […] years. Ever since President Obama took office, he’s been seeking every opportunity he could to infringe upon those rights. Gun and ammo sales have gone through the roof, as people have sought to make sure that they bought […]

    (0)
    (0)
  13. […] announcement of his illegal measures was nothing more than one more opportunity for the liar in chief to lecture the American public on […]

    (0)
    (0)
  14. […] announcement of his illegal measures was nothing more than one more opportunity for the liar in chief to lecture the American public on […]

    (0)
    (0)
  15. […] power under threat of incarceration until it is severely diminished, in order to then swiftly and permanently abrogate our 2nd Amendment, and then finally, the Constitution […]

    (0)
    (0)
  16. […] power under threat of incarceration until it is severely diminished, in order to then swiftly and permanently abrogate our 2nd Amendment, and then finally, the Constitution […]

    (0)
    (0)
  17. […] announcement of his illegal measures was nothing more than one more opportunity for the liar in chief to lecture the American public on […]

    (0)
    (0)

Speak Your Mind

All comments, messages, ideas, remarks, or other information that you send to us (other than information protected according to the law) become and remain our property. You are fully responsible for your comment, as depicted in Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of the website.

*