Why The War On Terror Is A War On American Liberty

Print page

war on american libertyIt’s bad enough that individual states are succumbing the regime’s ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, because they are actually already in a form of secession from the United States by their systematic state legislative departure from a National Constitutional Rule of liberty and justice for all.

But the Leftist Federal government is now hell bent to help individual states suppress any possible resistance and overthrow of their agenda.

California recently confirmed the enforcement of strict laws prohibiting opting out of vaccines for the radically spurious rationale of “general public safety”, to cover up the true conspiracy of Big Pharma’s greed to create obscene profits to dump back into the coffers of corrupt politicians. The same Big Pharma that also offers to an ambitious totalitarian regime the potential medium for future chemical induced mass ‘mind control’ of the population, if needed.

{adinserter bph}Therefore it is now against the state law to refuse inoculations with potentially deadly allergic toxins as your right to choose what goes in your body, or your religious right to reject it. That’s correct: you no longer have a 1st/A protection in the state of socialist sunshine and no fresh water.

They are already talking about making some examples out of  ‘dissidents’ by arresting people who refuse inoculations mandated at government workplaces. And your children will be forced to get needles jabbed in their arms on school vaccination days. And there’s nothing you can do to stop it!

What If You Resist and Protest?

Well, that’s the next scary puzzle piece that just became initiated. It’s yet another specious ‘fix’ to the badly broken DOHS/NSA fraud-scam on America that Congress voted 257 ‘For’, and 167 ‘Against’, last March to pass a bill (HR 240) giving this nitwit totalitarian alphabet agency 40 billion of your tax dollars to blow on 231,000 highly paid and benefited government spies dedicated to nothing more–certainly not preventing terrorism–than denying you your Bill of Rights.

Responsible citizens are simply fed up with the Feds thinking they can STILL cruise around all your private business and personal matters anytime they ‘feel’ like it even though the SCOTUS ruled the NSA’s spying is constitutionally illegal.

So the FBI is constantly gripping for more of your tax dollars to supposedly help control the spread of the ISIS in America, even though the government actually have not really cost effectively prevented a single Islamist from killing anyone yet in 10 years. A few self-set up police entrapment undercover style false flags here and there. Notwithstanding. Because any local police department already does this more than effectively enough.

In other words, the Feds are saying that the reason they aren’t catching any terrorists BEFORE they do something bad is not because of the outrageous money they have to spend on the most advanced privacy intrusion tools on the planet, it’s because they are ‘restricted’ by the Constitution in their personal spying efforts!

The strange irony here is maybe they actually believe that insanity. Some of these government spies really believe that it’s super fine and dandy to be an anti-Constitutional criminal as long as it fights terrorist criminals.

Amazingly a couple weeks ago, I saw a celebrity New York detective, Bo Dietl, make a comment on Fox regarding the ineffectiveness of the government’s war on terrorism, stating that if we want to clean it up “the people are going to have to give up some freedom for more security!” It shows you how your mentality changes when you become one of them, when you once might have been one of us.

Video first seen on Fox Business

But the innovation potential of the freedom loving American citizens eventually comes around to stomping Govt’s Nike gym shoe heel down on the snake head. People serious about protecting their personal and business privacy from prying eyes are now doing something about it, until we can all unite and vote out corrupt politicians again and change the laws back to protect the people’s rights.

They are using computer encryption programs to prevent mass random warrant-less internet spying and probing into your private financial affairs. Not because these citizens are doing anything wrong, but because the government hacks doing the spying are definitely not virgins when it comes to criminal conspiracies themselves.

Police State agencies are no joint venture team when it comes to entrapment, false flags, and stings which far too often target persons actually doing nothing–if not only minor things–wrong. And that’s giving the government the huge benefit of the doubt on the amazingly high rate (for such expensive training) of mistakes and “accidents” during routine investigations.

The Police State environment fosters a purview of intolerable unfettered intrusion powers aided and abetted by the poisonous perk of almost total consequential unaccountability.

Is It Too Late to Stop Them?

It’s doubtful. The  ’G’-boys (and girls) are now intensifying an effort to make yet another anti-4/A legislation to force private computer encryptions, to be opened anytime any alphabet soup agencies might want to know what you’re doing. This is more likely only for their prurient agenda based “fishing” interests because they certainly aren’t even catching terrorists the old fashioned way either?

Ironically, Jade Helm exercises were culminating lately in Texas and Utah which were the prime target areas among other undisclosed venues. Of course it was only coincidental that Texas and Utah happen to be main ’Militia’ states loaded with off-grid type anti-big G people who also happened to be armed to the teeth…

The G claimed it was just because these states happened to have rugged mountain terrain suitable for simulated battle conditions in other future war countries. Do you mean to tell me that all those other ’mountainous’ terrains across the country that the government already (paid for by taxes) owns aren’t good enough? What about the undercover plain clothes exercises in more urban communities under the Jade Helm operation?

How stupid do they think we are to believe that under cover spec ops raids are to ‘flush out potential terrorist sleeper cells’? Certainly not the IL lone wolfs. They just ‘go dark’ and live off welfare until they’re ready, just like most other career criminals or mentally deranged predators do.

This is nothing else but government ‘practice’ to quickly and effectively disarm the most potentially dangerous gun owners during a national state of Martial Law. Dangerous, that is, to intentional government tyranny, which the 2nd/A was primarily set up to combat.

Don’t they know yet that We, the People, know that the only reason they are spying on citizens is to set up a future shock troop nationwide overnight gun confiscation plan, after which they will then cheerfully float around and land all over your finances, wealth holdings, and cash and gold.? Which they’ll wind up seizing so that they can more easily facilitate all the eventual asset seizures (courtesy of laws already in place and future ones they’ll make) that all despotic governments eventually are ‘forced’ to resort to, as their economic fecklessness starts to feast upon itself while the economy collapses.

So, yeah, sure, the big bad American dog is going to quit moaning and jump up off the government nail he was laying on because it’s just starting to hurt way too much! And he’s going to show those teeth unless they ‘tranquilize’ him and put a muzzle on him.

More Tyranny Ahead

Recently, the Congress passed another new law that would allow the Secretary of State to ‘unilaterally’ (don’t you love that term?) cancel an American passport and launch a criminal investigation if he/she determines that any citizen “has aided or abetted” a terrorist organization.

What exactly does that mean? Does it mean you have proof beyond reasonable doubt that a person is “aiding and abetting” an enemy terrorist organization? Or do you now only need a suspicion from a subjective determination outside the rule of law and due process?  Far outside the established boundaries of probable cause and evidentiary due process.

Furthermore, in the truest spirit of slippery slope evil, and to literally LEAP on the kill the Constitution bandwagon, the Senate is also currently debating that passports be also cancelled for persons who owe ‘too much in back taxes’!

The newest unconstitutional American Freedom Act already allows government freezing of your bank and property assets if they suspect that you are “aiding and abetting” terrorists, so why do they need another one to totally restrict and confine your travels?

Even police are not allowed to restrict your travels unless you are under arrest. Which amounts to nothing less than de-facto incarceration. The police can’t even detain you at any length without probable cause. So I guess universal license plate scanning and GPS vehicle and smart phone tracking of everywhere you go just ain’t cutting it sharply enough? They want to see blood!

The Govt simply will stop at no limit to be able to keep you from moving around unless they can know everything you do and even control it. Is it because they don’t want you to be able to hide your guns and money too far from where they know where you live from the Real I.D Act they passed a while back a little higher up on the slippery slope.

The horrifying caveat here is the question of what exactly is the criteria ‘unilaterally’ determined without Constitutional due process or oversight? Subjective presumption is constitutionally illegal. Random NSA spying on anyone you associate through social media or almost any other internet integration could and would conceivably link almost anyone, somewhere down the infinite rabbit hole paradox of the World Wide Web, inevitably to some form of a so called terrorist by government definition.

The problem is that the definition is never clearly delineated. And what’s considered “aiding and abetting”? Agreement with some of their philosophy?  I’m wondering if when I carefully peruse this bill if it will also have a sneaked in sanction on gun ownership for anyone “unilaterally” determined to be “aiding and abetting” a terrorist. Why not, being potentially suicidal, having a drug habit, or fighting with your spouse, or telling your neighbor too firmly her dog can’t shit on your steps anymore, now immediately precludes you from exercising your uninfringeable’ 2nd/A rights?

What’s next, detention of citizens for transitioning from obese to “grossly obese”?   With the administratively mandated internment penalty for “morbidly obese” persons?  Oh, wait! How about talking bad about your government amounts to aiding and abetting a terrorist? “Yup, Senator, great input, I’ll get my staffer to write it up…”

Police State in Action

The Govt wasted no tax payer time stepping on the gas through this newest green light bill on continuous oppression of freedoms. They just announced a successful anti-terrorist raid on a 40 year old Boston area resident Arafat Nagi, a Muslim who allegedly is “aiding and abetting” terrorists. This arrest also provided a much needed morale boost for a grossly ineffective police state agency and they lost no time playing it out for max market value in the MSM.

However as I momentarily check the AP stories and other web feeds for details, because the TV news stations just had a ‘G’ marketing spot telling the story obviously for their own pump up, I can’t find any details that would legally support such an arrest under standard criminal statutes. But this new terrorist support law allowed the authorities to charge this guy and seize all his belongings under the new law with “attempting to aid a terrorist organization”.

It doesn’t take a seasoned cop to understand what a carte blanch authority this is to take away people for almost any reason this will turn out to be. At this time, all I can find is that because this Nagi bought some camping equipment and other things that are perfectly legal for anyone to buy, and just encouraged people to join him in his jumpin’ Jihad, he was arrested.

While nobody wants to see any psycho Islamist terrorists have it convenient to hurt anyone, the insidious problem is in the rationale that alters current criminal prosecution standards. We already have laws for any and all forms of harm or evil against people and property. They’re known as criminal statutes. If this Muslim, or extreme Christian anti-abortion fanatic was leading a band of like-minded radicals and tried to attack a mall, or bomb an abortion clinic then they still get charged with an aggravated felony assault or murder, etc., just like any other nut criminal doing a similar physical crime.

The problem is this new trend in cause for the arrest, and its expansive potential for extreme police state abuse. This type of law gives entirely new and frightening meaning to the term “conspiracy to commit”.  The entire activity concept of “supporting or abetting” is part of our entire existentialism, and is usually not a crime by itself. It’s socially dangerous to make helping people more of a crime than the committed criminal act itself. By this logic, a Muslim talking to a few of his cronies on Friday night after prayers at the local mosque, could be “aiding and abetting” Islamist terrorists.

In fact, by this flawed logic, ALL Muslims would seem to then be obligated to prove they were not “supporting” Islamist terrorists, because all Islamists are Muslims. Especially when you make the ambiguous definition of “support or aid” a separate crime in itself, only to be conveniently brought out when needed.

It’s not even a short stretch to see a time when speaking out against the government can be determined to be “aiding and abetting” a potential domestic terrorist group whose only furtherance of the crime was to be a…gun owner.

What’s Next?

Good patriotic citizens are whispering among themselves in whatever private surroundings they still have. They are getting angry. People are saying, “let me get this straight: we have a ‘declared War on Terrorism’ but our government is remiss and exceptionally suspicious in not identifying the enemy terrorist combatants as Islamists. We called Germans Nazis during the war; why can’t Muslim Extremists be called what they are?”

Then, in the most egregious failure of command strategy and concern for our soldiers, they have to fatal audacity to not allow enemy targeted on duty soldiers supposedly still doing their active duty defending our country in uniform to be armed while under ISIL attack!

The Govt was even reluctant to confirm that the killer was a radicalized Muslim. And instead, they disgustingly suggested that soldiers go plain clothes to help mitigate the danger. Then, they denigrated and treated armed free citizens who donated their time and risk to protect the soldiers and sent out a memo to refuse their security because the American citizens themselves could be terrorists!

People are very confused! First, the government sends at unwarranted risk our best and brightest young women and men into dubious foreign combat in worthless POS countries of no real danger or critical value to the U.S. to be gruesomely maimed and mutilated, or lost forever to their loved ones.

Then the V.A. can’t even treat these veterans in a timely and decent manner as they were promised and guaranteed by law! In fact, the V.A. directly caused many to decease prematurely, often in deplorable and inexcusable circumstances, and NOW, this suck job government won’t even allow our war heroes to defend themselves properly while they are trying to recruit more cannon fodder for an out of control government?!

I can’t, but can understand this at the same time. This is happening because once again, as usual, they’re lying to us. This is NOT a war on Islamist terrorism, unless they can also call it ‘domestic terrorism’.  Anybody not getting it yet?  It’s way past obvious.  It is a War alright, but it’s a war directly against the Freedom of the American people.

They don’t want the active duty military to have access to any firearms unless they are training with them or in actual combat. This is  because they don’t want the potential  contingency of large blocks of standing armed military also in rebellion against the government by joining ’We, the People’.  The Govt is corrupt, but being stupid is not one of their faults. The best totalitarian agenda scenario is keeping ALL military weapons locked up in well secured armories that crack Jade Helm type agents–who definitely will be armed–can easily defend. And any and all dissidents will automatically fall then into the new category of ”iding and abetting” terrorists. Only this time it will be American Patriot Domestic Terrorists!

 It’s Not Fear Mongering, It’s what’s Happening Now!

So what if people start to protest vehemently against the government for these mounting abuses and liberty violations? Remember the good Marxist General Wesley Clark, who ran for president on the Democratic ticket in 2004? He just commented on the gravity of the oh so serious problem–which really doesn’t exist–of horrid all pervasive ISIS terrorism in this country.

Remember he was the NATO Commander during the U.S. bombing of Serbia, who suggested that “disloyal Americans” “aiding and abetting” should be sent to internment camps for the duration of the conflict? Good thing, he missed the POTUS play, can you imagine being “unilaterally determined” to be a “disloyal American” arrested for supporting anti American sentiment, the next dangerous slip downward on Mt. Sippery Tyranny?

In a sound bit discussing the recent Chattanooga shootings, Clark said he recalled the internment (euphemism for imprisoned)  of American Citizens on U.S. soil who were committing no crime other than happening to be of related racial ethnicity to our WWII enemies overseas and being merely “suspected” or “determined” to have only sympathies to our Nazi and Japanese enemies at the time.

Clark said “back then we didn’t say ‘that was freedom of speech’,  we just put him in a camp.” The government unilaterally put entire families in camps during that time.  After all, it was a time of war.

It seems that these days, more and more authorities–both leftists and conservatists–are advocating these kinds of absolute government Fascist behaviors. Fema Camps around the country are gearing up. The government claims they are for temporarily housing hurricane and other national disaster refugees. But if you happen to drive by one on your summer vacation, you’ll swear they were at least a medium, if not maximum, security prison camp?

As a person conditioned by a life of tradecraft and training to rarely submit to flawed emotional content in manifestations of fear or nervousness, thinking about this latest move by the government is starting to pop small beads of sweat off my forehead, even though the ambient temperature is quite cool around me at the moment.

Political  historians out there are familiar with the urban legends of  the notion of  ”October Surprises” which are extreme political moves which supposedly occur just before the November elections, and may have tipping point influence in the outcome. The reality nobody wants to admit is that these ”October Surprises” do happen. They are historically referenced and proven.

But this year it seems like there’s an extra ingredient being added to a big potential “October Surprise” happening that gets tossed into the deadly soup almost every month with this regime. Which starts to smack of leading up to the dreaded evil progeny of such manifest political driving forces…and an alarming ‘Red Flag’ is waving in the distance, and represents a sinister portentous direction of bad unconstitutional winds blowing over the land… the False Flag event. Likely a big one.

With the  POTUS campaigns starting to resemble the plot from the movie ‘Gangs of New York’,  and monster money support being tossed around the Republican landscape like online grocery store coupons, and growing suspicion and distrust of Hillary appearing to denigrate the entire Democratic party status in the American collective consciousness to likely swing it toward the right even if she gets the  nom-nod,   the hard core leftist power elite will not go ‘quietly into forced retirement’.

Anything, and everything, is possible. And the only assurance for ’We, the People’, is that we will be further oppressed. Prepare yourselves! 


This article has been written by Mahatma Muhjesbude for Survivopedia.







8,732 total views, 4 views today

Mahatma Muhjesbude

About Mahatma Muhjesbude

Mahatma Muhjesbude is a former Spec-ops combat Vet, LEO, international security consultant, and private contractor. He has instructor level credentials and skills in various survival disciplines. He is a dedicated advocate of Liberty and Justice for all and a proactive defender of our Constitutional rights. He strongly believes that the best value you can give back in life is vital knowledge through experience, and that's why he's writing for Survivopedia, using a pen name to protect his real identity. You can send Mahatma a message at editor [at] survivopedia.com
Rate this article!
[Total: 31    Average: 4.1/5]


  1. Great article! I would have to disagree that it is only the hard core leftist elite who are capable of an October surprise. After all, is there really any difference between the so-called left or right? I think not.

    • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

      I didn't mean to imply that there is a difference. my emphasis on the 'leftists' is just because they are currently the regime in power and control.

      But you're absolutely correct. There is NO difference between the Republicans and Democrats once they get in office. It becomes business as usual. Corral and fleece the Sheeple. Buy and sell them for whatever the market can stand.

      Whichever party in a proprietary two party system (if you don't count the ghost party in the MSM) that intentionally excludes and eliminates all other competition is one and the same once they win the election. It's nothing more than a 'game of thrones' between one Royalist power elite or the other. With a couple 'dynastic' standbys (Bush/Clintons) thrown in as well for good measure.

      While a Utopian social paradigm in this country is still the swirl of a pipe dream, the dystopian juggernaut is at full balls to the wall throttle. Until that social dilemma is at least mitigated somewhat by the restoration of our Constitutional liberties while reining in the rise of the Federalist Police State...

      ...the situation of 'Them' against 'us' will worsen.

      • I dont now what to think anymore.I have read so much on the internet information ,which is, usually generated from cable tv or satelite tv.The local channels will never talk about it,until its to late. It scares the hell out of me.I have a 31 yr. old son and a 29 yr. old daughter.Who do u think i want to protect most,both right ,sure.Try and talk to your family about it,if we are on the same page.They will think your nuts.The truth is a present.Buy silver, golds to high,golds like ammo ability everybody needs it.Be willing

        • farhoud rastegar says:

          It was first the independence wars of America against England in the late 1700s. England lost.
          Then there was the war of 1812 when England tried to re-attack and regain a foothold in America. England lost.
          Then they tried to re-enter America's society through banking in the early 1800s. Jackson disassembled their banking system. England lost.
          Then there were the Civil Wars of mid to late 1800s, when England supported south in an attempt to separate the region from the rest of America. England lost.
          Then the Federal Reserve Bank and its associated IRS were formed by England in America to curb the financial independence of America. this time around, England appears to have had a stronger foothold. but in the early 1960s, the Kennedy brothers attempted to abolish these English entities, and utilized a new tool of communication to make the American people aware of the danger which lies under the cover of these entities. the brothers were both shot and killed, their media tools were hijacked.
          The media has then been used to tell America that everything is safe under the control of organizations which have slowly taken over America selling them out to England with one bit at a time.
          Please take the time and see the infiltration of the English into our society, our media, our banking system, our TV programs, the Hollywood movies, the introduction of trends, the music, and the taxation we pay to. England is returning.

          • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

            Interesting observation and perspective Farhoud, You have a good grasp of 'reality history'. And you hit the nail on the head with the 'infiltration' of our media. The owner/controller of the number one cable news network in the U.S.--although originally of Australian descent, i believe, is also from England,. Rupert Murdock. He was instrumental in getting/keeping Margaret Thatcher in power with his UK media outlet, and of course Stuart Varney, (finance) and a couple others on the FAUX News MSM are English. And the Great Bloviator Bill O is pushing the 'tertiary' (or actually the primary) agenda of Vaticanist theocracy in America. He's such an obvious Obsessive Compulsive moron on this that if you watch him enough (he's on my number 5 TV monitor i have on all the time) you can catch him saying things like '...those Secular Progressives are causing this and doing that' with a sneer of disdain on his face. To me this type of treasonous theocratic propaganda is an insult to every free thinking American Patriot. He doesn't realize that many of us do know our history and know that this country was NEVER founded on so-called historically corrupted Judeo-Christian 'principles'. It WAS, however, founded on Egalitarian Liberties and Justice for ALL with a written guarantee of those liberties backed up by the Constitutional LAW of The LAND, NOT 'God's' law.

            In fact, the Framers actually WERE Secular Progressives!
            1. And founded a SECULAR Nation.
            2. And made theocracies illegal in this country.

            O'Reilly's not stupid, so he intentionally and treasonouslly tries to redact and interpolate history for his own Vaticanist Agenda. Sadly ignoring the fact that if it weren't for this country's Secular society, he wouldn't be pissing all that poison out of his mouth so easily. The Protestant's would be kicking his Catholic fartass down the street and putting him in the old head and arm stock on their chruch's front lawn as an example to all 'sinners', once they got their version of 'theocracy' going, hahahah!

            Thank GAWD for the visionary Framers!

            Anyway, Farhoud, it's good to see some critical thought on these forums. I don't see England having too much 'real time' control over this country. At least not the people. All you have to do is look at their own shit-ass situation of totalitarianism (it's now the law that they are allowed to know everything everybody does) and see how stupid and worthless everything is.

            As a historian myself, with my academic specialty in 'religious history', I think everything you described has a behind the scenes 'Vaticanist' flavor to it, when you dig a little deeper...

            'They' bought most of the seats on the first boats here from England, NOT other Christians fleeing so-called 'religious persecution' like the mythology claims... hahahah!

  2. Well I personally think that the government should have control over the immunization process my son is 3 and I don't want him to die because some one doesn't want to have their child vacanated
    Having your Child vaccinated does not put the money in pharmaceuticals they have other ways of making big money off of us . Most vaccinations is covered under your child's health program anyway for us to be a strong healthy nation this must be enforced for the sake of all children

    • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

      Andrew, you missed the point. Nobody is saying that all vaccinations are bad. Even though there is serious conclusive evidence that during any mass vaccination sweep. There are always a percentage of deaths directly due to allergic reactions and other effects of the immunization not being tested effectively enough. That's why the military a while back after the war had a problem with all those vets refusing to be vaccinated. And if you want to wax 'conspiracy' theory, there are other more sinister plausible expose's on the subject if you want to do the research.

      But the POINT is that if you want your kid to have a vaccination for the specious notion of over all 'public safety', or in particular his own, that's fine.
      Then if he lives through it, that's good, if you killed him, you have to live with that. IT's YOUR decision. See the difference?

      In other words the weight of the worth is your responsibility and moral choice, NOT the government's.

      It should be YOUR informed choice and decision. NOT the government's!

      Especially in an environment where it seems that every de facto executive mandate or Bill passed is now done without any public discussion, any debate, or any careful social scrutiny. 'They' have successfully marginalized the entire
      Legislative Process! You know where that will eventually lead, don't you?

      And as far as vaccinations Not making huge profits for Big Pharma, where the hell have you been hiding your mind, Andrew? The Tami-flu scam alone rakes in unholy money. And naturally the G will help you pay for anything that will help 'control' you more?

      I can go on and on, but let me just say that the government's idea of a "...strong healthy nation (that) must be enforced for the sake of all children" is right out of a picture of 'Dante's Inferno'.

      They can't even properly take care of the Veterans, and you're going to trust them with your children?!

      If you want a healthy nation, and you don't want your son to die, start by educating people properly to quit stuffing their fat pie holes with all the poison the government lets you eat without EPA/FDA quality oversight, so that the AMA and Big Pharma and insurance companies gets richer giving expensive treatments and selling more poisonous drugs in a fraudulent attempt prolong the lives of so many dying people.

    • It has always been an option,its just right,Im 62 and no problems.My child. were vacsinated , have two.their was no thought in it . Look you do what you want but i understand your right,should be own on your terms

    • T.B. Bryceson says:

      If government officials were truly interested in the health of citizens and stopping the spread of diseases, they would do more to close the southern border against illegal immigration. Many of the diseases they are once again vaccinating against had already been nearly entirely "wiped out" in the U.S. decades ago, but the flood of illegal aliens who carry these diseases unchecked into our coutry from their own countries that do not have good healthcare systems. Twenty years ago, my five year old son somehow contracted measles, and was diagnosed by an older doctor who was amazed and brought in his entire staff, including younger doctors, to see what measles looked like, because none of them had ever seen or heard of a case of measles in decades. So now we once again have to subject our children to these diseases and give the government an excuse to inject our children with whatever they demand because of that same government's lax policies of not upholding immigration laws. You won't hear any public figures talk about this fact because it is "politically correct", but look at what is suddenly popping up on the national health radar--measles, polio, whooping cough, etc., all having been virtually eliminated since at least the 1970's. And remember when the saying "Night-night, sleep tight, don't let the bed-bugs bite!" was a cute, comforting, cheerful little rhyme that parents told their children at bed-time, when the children from AT LEAST the 60's-on really didn't have a clue what a bed-bug was? Now you see advertisements for bed-bug killer and bed-bug extermination everywhere, because it has once again become a problem (especially in hotels and motels). Where did they suddenly come from, huh? Did they just materialize out of thin air, or did they get sucked into a time-vortex/wormhole that transported them across nearly a century of time into our current time-stream? Of course not; they, along with these once-defeated diseases, were brought into our country hiding in the blankets, clothing and packs that were carried illegally across our southern border by the illegal immigrants our own government is refusing to control or deport. But then, if these diseases weren't popping up again, what excuse would they have to inject citizens with anything they want to?

      • The vaccination issue started out,perhaps, as an honest attempt to control dangerous contagious disease; but, as the pharmaceutical corporations realized the profits, the motivation perspective changed. Now it is all profit motivated, and even more diabolical, a means to infect and even damage the subject. More patients, more drug sales - such a deal.
        And now we become criminals when we refuse. Talk about a criminal conspiracy.

  3. Richard Magnano says:

    How is it that the Rev. Al Sharpton & Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam can and do travel the U.S. freely with the purpose of inciting riots and calling for 10,000 of their followers to rise up and kill anyone who they accuse of being responsible for the death of one of theirs? Is it because they definitely will fight back? Does Baltimore, Ferguson, New York, Kentucky bring back any memories?

    • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

      Good point, Richard. But apparently the 'eye' has been violating their rights also.
      The ACLU has just initiated an investigations/lawsuit that that accuses the G of spying in/on their computer activities, plans, schedules, etc.!

      Hey, when you're getting paid huge funding with taxpayers dollars, you can't discriminate in your illegal privacy intrusions and 4th/A Constitutional violations, now, can you?

      But don't worry, if Big Al and the gang get arrested and convicted of anything, you know who will pardon him.

  4. SoveriegnAmerican says:

    About 40 years ago, Readers Digest ran one of those "footnote" stories about the Salk polio vaccine. It was only produced at two locations, Atlanta and Denver if memory serves me correctly. Turns out one of the facilities used a suspension for the vaccine that was carcinogenic but the gov't covered it up because they didn't want any lawsuits. If you will remember, the polio vaccine was gov't mandated and paid for with taxpayer dollars.
    As concerns the rest of the article, Jefferson and the rest of the Founding Fathers are vomiting in their graves!

    "Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing [a people] to slavery." --Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774.

    Stop, Drop, and Roll won't work in Hell.

  5. Greg Dane says:

    Bo Dietl is a moron! He obviously does not knwo anything about what our forefathers thought about freedom and security! Ben Franklin said “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”

    Where do you draw the line Bo? If you want security in the country - enforce the laws - do NOT remove our Rights and Freedoms under our Constitution for your definition of "security" Get these limp wristed nitwits in Washington to just enforce the laws we have and close our borders then this will not be an issue!

  6. Great article! It covered many points eloquently.
    Regarding vaccines: do they really work? You get the shot, you don't get sick, right? Then if the vaccinated are safe, why the fanatical mandating others to get vaccinated too? By this reasoning, they can call me stupid and leave me alone since they are "safely" vaccinated. The reality is that the vaccines themselves are often the cause of getting the very illness the vaccine was to prevent. Even worse, when the vaccinated guinea pig goes through the complete cycle and is in the "shedding" phase, they infect others around them. Vaccinations are fueled by outdated and outright junk science to justify their use. Today we laugh at the thought of doctors bleeding patients with leeches to cure them of anemia 150+ years ago. That is how vaccines will be remembered in the not too distant future.

  7. The criminals occupying high government positions in the US have learned how to do their first and foremost job-stay in power. Their worst nightmares involve images of John Q. Public and company coming to their door with pitch forks and torches in the night looking for justice. That is why their vision of America does not include the citizens owning or having access to firearms. It is also why the training in the military is very compartmentalized and specific. The ruling elite can't train citizens to become future partisans in another civil war to reclaim the country from their grasp. Military or former military personnel wont have too broad of a skill set to be effective in such warfare outside the organizations that they control. Historical example: after WWII, the Soviets gave widespread partisan training to Hungarians, even in high school. That didn't work out so well for the Soviets when that training was used against them in the 1956 uprising.
    I never thought I would live to see the day when we are now in a similar situation in America but without the widespread skills to be effective.

  8. Bruce Latham says:

    Just a quick note. Back in the 1830's and 1840's the military disarmed the Mormons in Far West, Missouri, then the troops went forth and raped the women while the men where being held at knife point. History reports show some women being sexually abused until they died at the hands of these soldiers. (History of the Church Vol 1). The government tried to again disarm thet Mormons a second time at Nauvoo, IL but this time the Mormon's didn't surrender their weapons, but rather left the country. Years later, during the Depression, the government went to the homes of private citizens and confiscated their gold items, so your gold coins in the bank are open game. Just some food for thought.

  9. William A (Bill) Pitsker says:

    Most (im)mature Americans don't want to hear the truth which might stir up insecurity. Since most are fully indoctrinated into the dream-world of liberal collectivism (progressivism), they are just too disturbed by the chance (fact) that it could be (is) a charade. Many in my family don't want to hear from me because I'm one who isn't afraid to see the truth. They just won't accept the possibility (fact) that there might be (is) a conspiracy underlying the facade of the Republic.
    Since these poor souls vote, we are always stuck with the results.



  1. […] immediately changed the entire course of future 2nd Amendment and privacy rights cases, in favor of the gun confiscating group, and effectively opened the door for the worst anti-Constitutional legislating-from-the-bench […]

  2. […] immediately changed the entire course of future 2nd Amendment and privacy rights cases, in favor of the gun confiscating group, and effectively opened the door for the worst anti-Constitutional legislating-from-the-bench […]

  3. […] of separation of church and state, or even that the phrase doesn’t exist in the Constitution. Few of them have bothered to read the constitution anyway, although they’ll all swear that it’s in there. But in fact, the phrase […]

  4. […] of separation of church and state, or even that the phrase doesn’t exist in the Constitution. Few of them have bothered to read the constitution anyway, although they’ll all swear that it’s in there. But in fact, the phrase […]

  5. […] of separation of church and state, or even that the phrase doesn’t exist in the Constitution. Few of them have bothered to read the constitution anyway, although they’ll all swear that it’s in there. But in fact, the phrase […]

  6. […] as all these Extreme Crime Prevention and Public Safety measures swim in the deep sea waters of agenda base misguided anti-Constitutional overreach, shouldn’t serious potential participants in an active shooting War against civilian Americans at […]

  7. […] per usual in the liberal world, “fair” means taking something away from one person, to give it to another. But in this […]


Speak Your Mind

All comments, messages, ideas, remarks, or other information that you send to us (other than information protected according to the law) become and remain our property. You are fully responsible for your comment, as depicted in Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of the website.