5 Rationing Strategies You Must Know

If you’re old enough or if you’re a student of history, you may know about wartime rations.

Or, if you’ve lived under totalitarian regimes in Eastern Europe or China, you are aware of the fact that people can survive (and even thrive, as population actually grew during those times) on diets consisting of as little as 300 grams of rice/bread per day, and an egg and/or a little bit of bacon/meat a couple times a week. Nowadays, approximately 40% of US adults are obese and food is plenty, not to mention dirt cheap, hence rationing strategies as a topic of conversation may sound surreal even among preppers.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: I’m a survivalist and I’m always prepared for the worst; and it’s true that generally speaking, preppers in the US are already stockpiling nonperishable foods, guns, ammo and similar stuff, even if there’s nothing horrific at the horizon. But sometimes things just go wrong, and you know that old saying: man plans and God laughs.

Find out our Firefather’s Time-Tested Natural Cures and Household Remedies

The topic of today’s article is rationing strategies, as in who will get most food when SHTF, provided you have limited resources and no prospects for the situation to improve in the near future. What would you do with a limited food supply in an emergency, when you don’t know for how long you’ll have to lay low and chew the fat, together with your family and/or friends? Obviously, in such a scenario, food rationing is a nondebatable topic, but how would you implement your plan? Who you’d have to prioritize? Does everyone get an equal share? These are important questions if you come to think about it, and they’ll sooner or later present you with an ethical dilemma: when the survival of the “tribe” is at stake, who eats first and who eats last?

To begin with, you should know that the current “US diet” consists of approximately 2500 calories per day, give or take, which is a lot compared to the rest of the world. By the way, that’s why Americans are among the fattest people on Earth: we eat way too much and often the wrong things. However, in an emergency, one’s nutritional intake may very well be cut in half, or even worse, and that’s on top of the increased psychological stress and physical workload. What does that mean?

Well, you’ll be hungry, scared and tired, which further translates into anxiety, depression, apathy, and if the situation keeps going, your body will begin to fail, tearing through body fat first and then through the muscle. The thing about low calorie diets is that they can keep you alive for a long time, but you’ll have to deal with a lot of bad effects on your state of mind and overall health. With these things established, let’s see the basics of food rationing in emergencies.

Considering a 2000 calorie a day diet, which is what you should be eating normally, a reduced diet would consist in 1500 calories, while the lower limit would be 1200 calories. Depending on how much supplies you do have and knowing that you will not be capable of getting more food, you should start from here, i.e. gather all your food supplies, create an inventory of sorts, then group foods into categories, in order to determine which ones would have to be eaten first (the perishable stuff, obviously).

Image result for 1500 calorie a day diet

For example, you could use categories like vegetables and fruits, which are highly perishable, followed by dairy products and meats, cured/canned/dried goods, pasta and grains, cooking/baking supplies and so forth and so on, you got the idea. In the next step, you’ll have to determine (as in count) how much food you have, which may be a pain in the ass, but the easiest way would be to weight the food and have a general idea about how to convert X amount of Y food into Z calories.

It would be great to have prior knowledge (as in a chart with various foods’ nutritional value) about these things, such as how many calories are provided by a can of tuna fish for example.

After you’ve determined how big your food stockpile is, the next logical step is to consider how many people are you rationing for; thus you’ll be able to get the general idea about how long your food supply would last. Obviously, the smaller the portions, the lesser calories, the longer your food supply will last. As a general rule of thumb, adult males require more calories than females, 1700 calories for a male daily vs 1300 calories for a woman.

Age is also a factor when determining one’s daily caloric intake, as elderly people require less food generally speaking compared to younger people. For example, an elderly male requires only 1400 calories per day, while an elderly female can do with 1100 calories. Obviously, these are calorie intake guidelines for the average person, which are not set in stone and can be tampered with in a really bad situation. Just imagine that someone would have to hunt all day, or chop wood or whatever strenuous physical activity; it’s obvious that the respective person will have to eat more compared to, let’s say, a sedentary member of the group. There’s also the issue of people’s different metabolic rates, and so forth and so on, hence rations should be adjusted according to one’s gender, age, overall health, and physical activity status.

Based on all these “stats”, you’ll get the general idea of how many calories each person needs on a given day, and then you’ll have to determine how to deliver the respective calorie ratio based on your food stockpile. Since there are hundreds and hundreds of foods that can be stored, it’s almost impossible to make a comprehensive list here, but here are some basic guidelines:

  • a cup of white rice has 686 calories
  • a cup of oats has 147 calories
  • a cup of cooked spaghetti has 221 calories (2 oz dry)
  • an egg has ~100 calories (it’s size dependent)
  • 100 grams of ground beef will provide 164 calories
  • pork has 250 calories if fresh and 541 if cured
  • chicken meat has 200 calories per 100 grams
  • 3.5 oz of corn have 354 calories
  • 17 oz of baked potatoes have 255 calories etc.

Here’s a comprehensive food nutrition chart, just take a look and you’ll see what’s up with almost every imaginable food’s caloric content. Considering the fact that carb-rich (as in calorie-rich) foods are cheap and easy to store for a long time, it’s very probable you’ll have to eat a lot of those, so keep that in mind while reading the chart above. Speaking of low calorie diets, even in an emergency, less than 1000 calories a day is very dangerous for one’s health, and a long-time caloric intake of fewer than 1200 calories/day would be very hard to implement, as the “subjects” would face having difficulties in focusing on topics or making decisions, and they’d be feeling sad, lonely, numb, not to mention drained both mentally and physically.

But I saved the best part for last: most people tend to believe that even in desperate survival scenarios, the right thing to do is to equally share what food is left among the people in the group. As I already told you, people are far from being equal in this regard, as different folks burn different amounts of calories. If you make equal rations for all the people in the group, smaller people who eventually do less work will get more food than necessary, while bigger/more active people will not get enough food, and that’s not good.

And there’s always the ethical (and sometimes emotional) point of view: in a normal situation, a parent would go to sleep hungry so his/her children could have enough food to eat, but in a survival situation, children and other members of the group (sick people, elderly, women etc) would be relying on others to work and keep them safe, hence it would be a terrible idea (as in suicidal) to keep the latter malnourished. For a no-nonsense and very interesting “rant” on this topic, I’d strongly encourage you to watch this video.

Let me know your thoughts in the comment section.

Written by

Chris Black is a born and bred survivalist. He used to work as a contractor for an intelligence service but now he is retired and living off the grid, as humanly possible. An internet addict and a gun enthusiast, a libertarian with a soft spot for the bill of rights and the Constitution, a free market idealist, he doesn't seem very well adjusted for the modern world. You can send Chris a message at editor [at] survivopedia.com.

Latest comments
  • Nice article. I too have considered how best to ration that emergency supply of food, realizing that people differ in their calorie requirements. While my planning/buying is based upon carefully measuring ingredients in order to make three nutritionally balanced family meals per day and give each household member 2000 calories per day, that is not exactly how I intend to feed everyone. My intention is, when starting on food rationing, that any household member who is 20 or more pounds over their ideal Body Mass Index (BMI ) will go on half rations (1000 calories per day) until they have reached the upper level of their ideal BMI. The weight reduction may not take very long if people are doing a lot of physical labor (gathering wood, hand-washing laundry…). And the food supplies will stay under lock and key and are not the kinds of foods for quick snacking anyway. Obviously, some household members may not need a full 2000 calories per day if they are not doing a lot of physical labor and food portions can be adjusted to give younger people more calories and the elderly a little less calories. The way I look at it, the less that food is wasted and the less over-feeding that occurs, the longer those emergency food supplies can feed a family.

    • I’m probably one of those “20 lbs over” people, and caution you against your strategy of cutting to 1000 calories, at least not suddenly. It takes time for the body to begin to burn fat, and the physiological transition can render your people useless or worse if not done properly. I certainly appreciate and understand your essentially accounting philosophy, but a sudden cut from 2000+ calories to 1000 will change personalities and productivity. I know because I have tried it. I became irritable, argumentative and unable to concentrate to complete tasks. At 1000 calories, probably delivered in 2 or 3 feeds, blood sugar crashes repeatedly throughout the day, Depending on the individual’s personality, they may become hostile, unable to make decisions or to understand instructions and execute them. Some may become violent. For an extra 500 calories, from me you get a good analyst, engineer and good shot for guard duty. It may be worth the extra 500 calories of food (in our case, I contributed more than 50% of the group’s food and sprouting seeds) to keep me useful. If needed to get all down to a lower calorie count, do it over a period of 7 to 10 days, not cold turkey. If done too fast, it could be enough for someone to become homicidal, due to the effect of the sudden change on the brain. In the mean time, start the microgreens and a garden to stretch the food supply.

      • Thank you for your opinion. As someone who spent a year on a 900-1100 calorie a day diet, I do understand what weight-loss dieting is like. I also understand that when people shelter in place, they tend not to need as many calories as someone doing strenuous activities and that some people actually lose their appetite when stressed and worried. I also understand that some people, if given the opportunity, will go on a feeding binge every day when stressed and eat all the starchy and sugary foods they can.

        In my household, if faced with a prolonged food rationing emergency, we will restrict our calories to the amount we need for healthy functioning while stretching the food supply for as long as possible. Any over-weight household member who wants to supplement their weight-loss meals, can certainly go out and forage.

  • Anthropology studies about the effects of famine show that men usually justify eating far more calories than women because they need their strength to protect the family and to hunt of fish. Women eat far fewer calories because they want to be sure their kids get enough to eat and since women are usually in charge of the food stores and the cooking it’s easy to hide how much they are or are not eating. Women on average are likely to provide the family with calories from gardening or gathering and men from hunting or fishing. In famine conditions, women provide the family with approximately 80% of the total calorie intake and men provide the other 20%. This seems hard to believe but in all famine conditions game becomes scarce. The result is that women are more likely to suffer severe effects of famine including death than are men. So to the men out there if you love your women, keep an eye on how much they are actually eating. Good chance they won’t bring attention to the fact that they are sharing their food and water with others..

  • Common sense article

  • It’s always good to have an elected leader or organizer, or both, to be in charge of hunting/gathering, then the distribution of said foods. The distribution should indeed take into account the elected/volunteered roles of each person in the group/community. Each person needs to agree, in writing/signature, what roll hre will play/contribute, in that group. This includes agreeing to his ration amount according to that role he/she has, and sign & swear, or pledge to this commitment. Judgements and punishments for breaking this oath within the community or group that is relying on the honesty and diligence of each person in the function of the whole, should be voted on and given to a separate person(s). In the end, meetings should be held regularly by those individuals or their representatives, to see how each persons we’ll bring and their particular functions are progressing, and make ration adjustments accordingly. In theory we as a nation work that way today, but in many places and programs, it has become a skewed, and unfortunately ‘unfair’. When reform in actual crtical rationing plans or programs is needed, and aren’t corrected, disagreements & chaos eventually follows, and soon after that, conflict. Conflict is resolved by war, or by reformation terms agreements, or by the former followed by the latter. This not new, as this has occurred through all generations, all nations, and throughout all time. People have to take an honest place/role in the group, and accept the correct/honest rations assigned to the role, or nothing in the group will work at all. It will cease to exist.

  • Important and eye opening information. Anyone interested in good health during difficult times would by wise to save this article along with the comprehensive charts.
    Well done.

  • Concise and important information contained in this article.. Anyone interested in good health during difficult times would by wise to save this article along with the comprehensive charts.
    Well done.

LEAVE A COMMENT