Obama’s Nuclear Deal Is Slapped In The Face

Print page

big slapped

Benjamin Netanyahu’s long awaited speech to the U.S. House of Representatives finally happened this last week. Invited at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, the visit and speech has been controversial since it was first announced. Carried out without the White House’s involvement or even approval, it can be easily seen as a slap of the face to the president, for his lack of support of Israel.

The United States has officially supported Israel since its creation in 1948. Throughout the last few decades, that support has waxed and waned with the political tides.

When we had a Republican president in office, Israel received the support of the United States. But when the Democrats took office, that help turned into slim pickings indeed.Even so, none of the other Democrat presidents have been as negative towards Israel as the current resident of the White House.

Why Netanyahu Can’t Trust Iran

Obama’s support of Islam is well known. He has given them considerable support, even to the harm of the United States and our interests. Throughout his tenure in the Oval Office, he has spoken highly of the Muslim faith and given them every advantage possible.

While there are several Muslim countries which might try to lay claim to being their leader, Iran has been the most vocal in support of the fight against Western culture, specifically against the United States of America. As far back as the 1970s, they declared war on us and as best I know, they never changed that.

In the midst of this, Benjamin Netanyahu comes to the United States and speaks out against Iran. His speech before the House of Representatives focused on the dangers of Iran, specifically on the dangers of allowing them a nuclear program.

As we know, Obama allowed Iran to pursue their nuclear program, pending the current negotiations. He is supposedly in the midst of drafting a new treaty with them, which will probably allow them to pursue nuclear power, but block them from developing nuclear arms. In a way, that’s somewhat of a joke. The ability to develop nuclear power will automatically give them the ability to develop nuclear arms, whether in the open or in secret.

Netanyahu’s justifiable fear is that if Iran succeeds in developing a nuclear bomb, that they will use it against Israel. With Israel’s small size, they could destroy a large part of the country with one device. Even if they weren’t successful in destroying everything, the portions left would be leaderless and easily overrun by conventional forces.

To add to Netanyahu’s discomfort, Israeli satellites have already photographed ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) in Iran.

So, the problem of a delivery vehicle to go with a nuclear bomb seems to already be solved. Once the bomb were complete, it wouldn’t take much for them to send it off and destroy Israel.

Video first seen on Today News

True to his fashion, Netanyahu pulled no punches, urging Congress to block the current agreement and not allow Iran to go forward. He made a good case for why we shouldn’t trust Iran to stick to the agreement, citing past actions of Iran, where they have blocked inspectors and lied on an international level. There is no true guarantee that they would follow this agreement any more than they have any of the others they’ve ignored.

Who Is Protecting Who?

It is clear that Iran is a danger not only to Israel, but to the United States and the world in general. Even Saudi Arabia understands this, which is why the first Gulf War was fought for limited goals. They didn’t want Saddam Hussein destroyed, because he served as a buffer between Iran and their country.

Netanyahu’s speech was well received by the majority of Congress, with him having to stop several times to wait for thunderous applause. But while many Democrats applauded him, there were others who were upset, saying that he was speaking out against the United States and President Obama. It is clear that Bibi is a much stronger leader in international relations than Obama is and that alone makes Obama look bad.

Obama’s response? He claimed that Netanyahu has not “offered any viable alternatives” to negotiating with Iran. Perhaps that’s because in Obama’s world view, helping Iran develop nuclear bombs is necessary. It’s clear that he’s more concerned about protecting Iran from Israel than he is of protecting Israel or the United States from Iran. He showed that when he said that he would order shot down any Israeli jets that attacked the Iranian nuclear power facility.

Not surprisingly, this speech just further polarized many American politicians. But surprisingly, the Senate voted unanimously to welcome Bibi to speak to a joint session of Congress. Senate Democrats ignored the orders of Obama in this and voted unanimously in support of Israel.

So, while the White House doesn’t support Israel, it appears that there are some Democrats who do.

This article has been written by Bill White for Survivopedia.

Rate this article!
[Total: 189    Average: 3.8/5]

21,200 total views, 2 views today

Bill White

About Bill White

Bill White is the author of Conquering the Coming Collapse, and a former Army officer, manufacturing engineer and business manager. More recently, he left the business world to work as a cross-cultural missionary on the Mexico border. Bill has been a survivalist since the 1970s, when the nation was in the latter days of the Cold War. He had determined to head into the Colorado Rockies, should Washington ever decide to push the button. While those days have passed, the knowledge Bill gained during that time hasn’t. He now works to educate others on the risks that exist in our society and how to prepare to meet them. You can send Bill a message at editor [at] survivopedia.com.
Rate this article!
[Total: 189    Average: 3.8/5]

Comments

  1. David Aune says:

    It is unconstitutional for a President to pass or sign a treaty without Congressional approval. But since when did that little issue ever stop the Tyrant in the White House?

    (38)
    (1)
  2. rev. dave says:

    If they expect or hope to keep their jobs, a lot more Dems will turn against Obama before the next primary. Otherwise they'll just be tossed out like trash when the house-cleaning is done. (White House cleaning, that is...)

    (30)
    (1)
  3. If the Jewish people are so worried about Iran maybe the Jews in the U.S. should quit supporting Dems. in our elestions!!

    Vote Rep. or quit complaining !!

    (36)
    (3)
    • That is something I've always wondered about....... Why Jews always support their own worst enemies. Deep down inside, they must have adored Adolf Hitler........

      (3)
      (4)
      • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

        Well, Kevin, in all seriousness a lot of thinking people are curious about that. You'd have to start by understanding the differences in Orthodox Judaism, Zionism, Jewish Nationalism and Westernized Jewish nationalities and their 'politics', and the origins of the fascinating Jewish history from past to present that's never truthfully portrayed in conventional educational history.

        (2)
        (1)
  4. SPECIAL FORCES says:

    WE CANT TRUST IRAN, AND WE SURELY CANT TRUST OBUMMER, THEY HAVE BOTH LIED TO AMERICA FOR YEARS, IRAN HAS ALL WAYS SAID DEATH TO THE PIGS WHO ARE AMERICANS , WIPE THE JEWS OFF THIS EARTH . THE JEWISH PEOPLE GET BOMBED DAILY , IF THAT HAPPENED TO AMERICANS AND AMERICA , WOULD WE STAND FOR IT , I DONT THINK SO, WELL I STARTED DIPPING MY BULLETS IN BACON GREASE , SO IF THE BULLET DOESNT KILL THE ENEMY , THE BACON GREASE WILL , THE MUSLUMS ARE ALL READY STOPPING CAMPUS NEWS PAPERS FROM PRINTING THE WORD BACON ON THE DAILY MENU , THEY WANT TO STOP RESTURANTS FROM COOKING BACON ,BECAUSE THEY DONT LIKE THE SMELL, GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM, DONT TRY TO CHANGE AMERICA , I GUESS THATS WHAT OBUMMER MEANT, WHEN HE SAID I WILL BRING CHANGE, YOU CAN KEEP YOUR CHANGE YOU TRAITOR. I LOVE BACON ,AND IM NOT GONNA CHANGE FOR ANY MUSLUM , IF YOU THRETEN ME , AND I DO FEEL YOU ARE THETENING ME AND ALL AMERICANS, MY BULLETS ARE WAITING FOR YOU. WAKE UP AMERICA .

    (28)
    (1)
  5. It appears there is really two alternatives that need happen if we are, at all, able to save our nation from Obama's own tyranny or from any external forces because of Obama's sympathizer mentality and ideologies.

    The American people must openly protest and call for IMPEACHMENT in a
    wide and robust measure without any let up, or better yet. that Obama should be ARRESTED on many different treasonous counts and his assaults on our Constitution (and ask questions through a trial later).

    It is ONLY going to be through our own revolting against this so-called leader or President, that we will make any in-roads to saving our nation from even further tyranny and losing our first Amendment and other rights at all.

    I hope through your organization, the Tea Party and others (I believe being instruments in the hand of God) to generate the means necessary to make people EXTRA AWARE of the critical situation we're all in, TAKE ACTION, and
    become the catalyst for which we can turn things around.

    I am as most people are, very concerned (to say the least) as to the status of our country and us as citizens of this once great and can be country and pray that those who are not as aware, or in full realization will wake up and openly but peacefully oppose and do what it takes to fight for our country...even if it should result in a full out revolution against this administration. It is really coming close to what the Egyptians did with Pres. Morsi -overthrowing him because of his unbearable actions on his own people.

    What happened to the brave, courageous and stout-hearted people who were like the founders of our country? Isn't anyone getting it, or getting the least bit or plenty mad at what's going on? That in itself is inexcusable, and pitiful.

    Thank you for your articles and position on current events. I pray it isn't falling upon "deaf ears".

    (12)
    (0)
  6. JOHN HERWICK says:

    The Quran specifically states that it is permissible for muslims to lie and deceive infidels and apostates if it furthers their aims. So much for trusting Iran to live up to the terms of any treaty or agreement.

    (28)
    (1)
    • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

      Yes, it is formerly called Taqiyya (in various spellings). And they even intentionally 'play' on this corrupt 'benefit' from Allah to maintain their unholy insanity.

      (3)
      (1)
  7. Kate DeZeeuw says:

    We all must remember that God is still and always be in control of the, "Apple of his eye!" Deuteronomy 32:10--He found him in a desert land, and in the waste howling wilderness; he led him about, he instructed him, he kept him as the APPLE OF HIS EYE.
    Psalms 17:8 --Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings.
    Must always remember who is really in charge of tiny Nation of Israel!!
    Sincerely and prayerfully, Kate DeZeeuw

    (26)
    (0)
  8. Jean Bailey says:

    If any of you are not aware of what this tyrant is trying to do watch the movie "2016" and America by Sousa. Also read Obama's Book he wrote himself, saying he is going to avenge his Father (dad) and Obama's Mentor's who were men who criticized the U.S. and see what his son (Obama) and all the Cabinet members that he has working for him has in mind for us. We are in danger of being under Sharia Law. We need to wake up America, we are losing our Country.

    (16)
    (0)
    • Obama's father is not the one he says in his book. If you want to see the undeniable proof of who his real father is and the families CIA links ect. read a book called Dreams from my Real Father by Joel Gilbert.

      (3)
      (0)
  9. The 'youngers' need to stop so much facebooking & iPhoning and watch and listen to what is happening in the USA and the World. Then the next time they vote they will do a better job! I certainly don't like what our gov is doing without decent leadership, a ship without a rudder ! So sad.

    (9)
    (0)
  10. BrianW517 says:

    Obama's Muslim, enough said!

    (10)
    (0)
  11. Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech was meant to give cover to the U.S. for an Israeli attack on Iran should it happen. It is meant to create the appearance of a divide between the 2 countries so the U.S. does not get drawn into the conflict should it happen. It is nothing more than a theatre of propaganda to fool the people who don't know what goes on behind the scenes of mainstream media lies.

    (2)
    (1)
  12. Jim johnson says:

    This is Valerie Jarretts doings! She runs this country,and she is a damn
    Iranian..period

    (4)
    (1)
  13. W.V. Bonds says:

    I thought that one of Congress’s two branches HAD to approve of any treaty for it to become effective?

    (0)
    (0)
  14. He has constantly signed his name to projects without the Congress's approval. Because HE is a "president intent on removing the freedoms we have enjoyed, since 1776". He never served in the military, never accomplished anything except being a rabble rouser for the destruction of the United States of America.

    (3)
    (0)
  15. It takes a congressional approval for it to be a treaty! Otherwise it is just a piece of paper!
    Thanks,

    (1)
    (0)
    • Tell that to Obama...

      President orders illegals amnesty outside of law
      President signs small arms treaty and implements it outside of law
      President orders government control over the internet outside of law
      President orders ban on most popular rifle ammo outside of law

      And the list goes on...

      (8)
      (0)
  16. In essence what it shows is the Democrats are finally opening their eyes to common sense for a change and also seeing if they open both eyes wide enough that the president is giving aid and comfort to the enemy of the free world! He should at minimum be immediately impeached and when there is enough proof then arrest him as a fraud and traitor!

    (4)
    (0)
  17. Signing a deal with Iran could be the biggest error of Obma's life...and it could cost us our lives.
    History will not look well upon this moment.

    (1)
    (1)
    • Iran is no threat to the U.S. The only reason countries like Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Syria are targeted is because the West wants to keep the Middle East and Africa in a state of conflict so the people there can never self determine and stand on their own for as long as it takes to quietly take over the region for globalist interests. As well, those countries are/were not under globalist banking cartel control. Simply take a look at what countries do/did not have a central bank in the past 10-20 years.
      In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:
      Afghanistan
      Iraq
      Sudan
      Libya
      Cuba
      North Korea
      Iran
      The list is a who's who of Western backed aggression and overthrow. Almost immediately as countries are taken over a central bank is created to leech the country clean.

      (5)
      (3)
      • Mahatma Muhjesbude says:

        Gerry, I agree. That's one of the real reasons 'we' moved on Quadaffi in Libya. He and his buds in Qatar were planning to undermine the dollar by implementing their own proprietary gold standard.

        But what about Russia and China, is their monetary system csontrolled by/connected to the NWO 'Rothschild'/Bilderberger style banking conglomerate?

        (0)
        (0)
  18. This is a Very Good Article, I support Netanyahu & Israel, and so should the USA and to Heck with Obumer !

    (3)
    (0)
  19. TREASON/OBAMA punishable by death isn't good enough ! ...

    (1)
    (0)
  20. Happy birthday Bones.I use my Hebrew date bceuase it usually makes me a few days younger.Check it out.As to most anything the UN does especially concerning Israel, "Dumb and Dumber" would be an over the top compliment for the majority of its members."Insane and Insaner" woulds also be too complimentary.Are you having a party?

    (0)
    (0)

Trackbacks

  1. […] in Congress trust Obama on this deal, as historically he has been supporting Islam, even to the harm of the United States. It is likely […]

    (0)
    (0)
  2. […] in Congress trust Obama on this deal, as historically he has been supporting Islam, even to the harm of the United States. It is likely […]

    (0)
    (0)

Speak Your Mind

All comments, messages, ideas, remarks, or other information that you send to us (other than information protected according to the law) become and remain our property. You are fully responsible for your comment, as depicted in Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of the website.

*